Interactive elements should be reachable and operable through a keyboard where the interface requires interaction. A visually obvious control can still be unavailable to someone using another input method. For this launch verification page, the practical test is whether the status can be supported by dated evidence for its stated coverage.
Can the page be used without a mouse?
Start with an owner examining a passed check and a pending check. The keyboard access check concerns the tested version, named destinations and evidence behind the status. A seal is meaningful only within its documented scope. Editorial approval, technical launch verification and measured business outcomes represent different claims.
A successful sample or homepage test should not certify every branch. Coverage should name which locations and response states were actually checked.
Check it on this page
Read the status report and find the evidence behind one passed item and one unresolved item before interpreting the badge.
- Tab through the controls in a meaningful order.
- Open menus and operate links with the keyboard.
- Check the return from any expanded or modal state in an approved preview.
A shared link treatment underlined an entire content block
One reviewed page applied hover underlining to a large linked area, making the whole block look like linked text. The repair needed to address the scope of the style rather than rewriting the content.
For this launch verification page, the check focuses on the tested version, named destinations and evidence behind the status. Style the action label deliberately and check the pointer and keyboard states after changing a shared rule.
Repair the source, then check the published result
Repair inaccessible controls and preserve suitable native behavior. Retest entry, interaction and recovery instead of checking only the first focusable element.
Record the keyboard access result for this destination, then repeat the customer route until the status can be supported by dated evidence for its stated coverage. If the repair changed a shared component, compare another destination with different approved facts to detect unintended copying.
Explore a relevant example
The linked Benchmark page helps you inspect the tested version, named destinations and evidence behind the status. It is a current example to explore, not evidence that every business has the same problem.
Further reading
Platform guidance can change. Consult the current official documentation before making platform-specific changes.
Have a question about this?
Ask Benchmark about your situation. Your inquiry will include this article's topic, and any paid work starts with an agreed scope.
Ask an Expert