Images should be labeled according to what they actually show. A manufacturer example, fictional design and completed client project are different forms of evidence. For this website package page, the practical test is whether the package comparison and inquiry retain the same approved scope.
Do images accurately represent their source?
Start with an owner comparing two website packages. The image provenance check concerns included features, quoted extras and the path to discuss a package. A short summary can contradict the detailed scope or make a repair credit look like cash. Preserve the approved terms across the comparison and quote.
One-location launch work and multi-location work are different scopes. A cloned package table must not conceal branch setup or imply a credit is cash.
Check it on this page
Compare two packages from the overview through the detailed terms, then follow the relevant project inquiry.
- Identify the source, permission and caption of each prominent image.
- Check whether nearby words imply an actual project or result.
- Label demonstrations and manufacturer examples according to their true purpose.
Sharing signals received less attention than the visible design
Public source reviews found missing Open Graph URL values and image metadata associated with another market. These are separate from the main page title and can survive a redesign if the sharing fields use another template.
For this website package page, the check focuses on included features, quoted extras and the path to discuss a package. Inspect the URL, title, description and image description that a sharing client receives. A corrected heading does not update those fields automatically.
Repair the source, then check the published result
Use truthful labels and approved attribution, and protect private customer information. Keep useful visual context without presenting a demo as a completed client result.
Record the image provenance result for this destination, then repeat the customer route until the package comparison and inquiry retain the same approved scope. If the repair changed a shared component, compare another destination with different approved facts to detect unintended copying.
Explore a relevant example
The linked Benchmark page helps you inspect included features, quoted extras and the path to discuss a package. It is a current example to explore, not evidence that every business has the same problem.
Further reading
Platform guidance can change. Consult the current official documentation before making platform-specific changes.
Have a question about this?
Ask Benchmark about your situation. Your inquiry will include this article's topic, and any paid work starts with an agreed scope.
Ask an Expert