Interactive elements should be reachable and operable through a keyboard where the interface requires interaction. A visually obvious control can still be unavailable to someone using another input method. For this location page, the practical test is whether the contact and directions actions still belong to the selected branch.
Can the page be used without a mouse?
Start with a customer opening one branch from a search result. The keyboard access check concerns that branch’s name, address, hours, map and contact action. A local heading can coexist with a different branch's footer, phone or inquiry destination. One correct field does not resolve the contradiction.
Branch A and Branch B can share a design while retaining different phone numbers, schedules and inquiry destinations.
Check it on this page
Open the branch directly, compare its contact panel with its map, then follow the contact action and check retained location context.
- Tab through the controls in a meaningful order.
- Open menus and operate links with the keyboard.
- Check the return from any expanded or modal state in an approved preview.
A shared link treatment underlined an entire content block
One reviewed page applied hover underlining to a large linked area, making the whole block look like linked text. The repair needed to address the scope of the style rather than rewriting the content.
For this location page, the check focuses on that branch’s name, address, hours, map and contact action. Style the action label deliberately and check the pointer and keyboard states after changing a shared rule.
Repair the source, then check the published result
Repair inaccessible controls and preserve suitable native behavior. Retest entry, interaction and recovery instead of checking only the first focusable element.
Record the keyboard access result for this destination, then repeat the customer route until the contact and directions actions still belong to the selected branch. If the repair changed a shared component, compare another destination with different approved facts to detect unintended copying.
Explore a relevant example
The linked findings show documented public identity and customer-path problems. They illustrate a review method, not the current state of an unnamed company.
Further reading
Platform guidance can change. Consult the current official documentation before making platform-specific changes.
Have a question about this?
Ask Benchmark about your situation. Your inquiry will include this article's topic, and any paid work starts with an agreed scope.
Ask an Expert