An old route needs appropriate treatment when content moves or retires. Sending every retired URL to the homepage can erase useful context without providing an equivalent answer. For this audit pricing page, the practical test is whether the chosen audit’s scope matches the request made at the next step.
What happens to old versions of this page?
Start with an owner choosing between local-presence and website reviews. The retired urls check concerns the named scope, price, coverage and deliverable. Different audits can overlap without being identical. A pricing table should explain the distinction and avoid presenting all findings as verified measurements.
A corporate site and a location network need an explicit coverage count. A single-location price should not imply all branches are checked.
Check it on this page
Match a known problem to the review that addresses it, then compare the selected scope with the inquiry destination.
- Identify what the old page answered and whether it has a genuine successor.
- Inspect its status code and final destination.
- Retest important entry links without forcing unrelated content through the homepage.
A not-found page title did not identify the broken entry links
An earlier reporting review surfaced not-found activity without enough failed-path detail to identify the original URLs. A title-level total was insufficient for choosing precise redirects or fixing the referring links.
For this audit pricing page, the check focuses on the named scope, price, coverage and deliverable. Retain the requested path and relevant referrer in authorized diagnostic reporting, without collecting private inquiry text.
Repair the source, then check the published result
Use relevant redirects when there is a genuine successor and appropriate missing-content behavior otherwise. Retest important entry links and preserve useful campaign or inquiry selections.
Record the retired urls result for this destination, then repeat the customer route until the chosen audit’s scope matches the request made at the next step. If the repair changed a shared component, compare another destination with different approved facts to detect unintended copying.
Explore a relevant example
The linked Benchmark page helps you inspect the named scope, price, coverage and deliverable. It is a current example to explore, not evidence that every business has the same problem.
Further reading
Platform guidance can change. Consult the current official documentation before making platform-specific changes.
Have a question about this?
Ask Benchmark about your situation. Your inquiry will include this article's topic, and any paid work starts with an agreed scope.
Ask an Expert